Cyberbullying
When we think about cyberbullying
as educators, we sometimes brush over the topic, or justify not getting involved
since it takes place off school campus. Due
to the pandemic, most students noe have access to the internet via school laptops. Many of my 5th graders also have
cell phones and do bring them to school even though our policy is that they
cannot use them in school. In the past, I
have been guilty of teaching internet safety and using the generalized scare tactics,
stating bullying someone online may result in them taking their own life, and/or
be careful about the information you share because of sexual predators. More recently, students have been more open
about their experiences on social media and with bullying, which has changed my
mind on how to address the issue with individual students and classes as a whole. No
longer can we say this should be handled at home. Educators must look more
closely at how they present information and choose curriculum regarding
internet safety and the importance of digital citizenship.
One place any educator could start is
Commonsensemedia.org. This site contains an abundance of
information for parents, teachers, and advocates including their Digital
Citizenship Curriculum that provides lesson plans and activities for all age
groups on topics such as internet safety and cyberbullying. Cyberbullying.org
is another great website which provides a variety of videos for educators to
use when delivering instruction on digital citizenship. This site has videos for all ages and as an
upper elementary teacher about to teach younger students in a library setting,
I appreciate the videos for our youngest learners. In the
past I have used BrainPop and find that students can relate to videos
and articulate the learning objective however, I have not seen it make much of an
impact on students. It seems as though
our students are becoming more detached and mean in their group chats and on
social media. Therefore, there is a great need to invest
time and experiences for the educators at my school about the importance of implementing
a digital citizenship curriculum. This coming school year I plan to work with
our current librarian, school counselor, and administration to develop a plan
for making digital citizenship a priority in our school.
In this week readings I was not
surprised by the results of a Bickham, et. al. (2021) study evaluating a
digital citizen curriculum done with 7th grade students regarding gender
differences in aggression. Researchers
found that, “Cyberbullying among males tends to be outwardly aggressive, with
more threats of violence and direct insults, whereas females are more likely to
post gossip with the intent to harm their peers.” This seems to be a given even with younger
students. My male students tend to be
more aggressive and my female students tend to be more passive aggressive
towards their peers. What interested me
about the study and made me think about how I address curriculum in the future,
is the need to provide instruction based on the type of cyberbullying more
common in different genders. Maybe we
should separate students and teach them different skills that apply to different
types of cyberbullying. Maybe female
students would be more open about discussing the types of bullying they deal
with and/or participate in since often they might feel less apt to participate
or talk about their feelings regarding said topic in front of their male peers
and vice versa. What do you think?
References
Bickham D, Moukalled S, Inyart H,
Zlokower R. (2021). Evaluating a Middle-School Digital Citizenship Curriculum
(Screenshots): Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(9):e26197.
DOI: 10.2196/26197
I, too, am dedicated to collaborating to provide positive digital citizenship experiences for my elementary school students. I am in favor of your idea of splitting boys and girls up for these lessons. Prior to your post, I had never really thought of that. Boys and girls do seem to harass differently. Maybe there could be collaborative whole-group lessons. Then, break down into more "specific" lessons with a "come back together" session (or more) to report findings. You've got me thinking. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDelete